Friday, November 10, 2017

Officers of the Court have Admitted to Fraud and Forgery in this Courtroom. Officers of the court cannot prove who a Trustee is or Provide Proof of it's existence, Unlawful Guardianship OVER ADULTS, yet Judge Rosemarie Scher is continuing to allow this case to move forward, why?

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF
THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN
 AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

INRE: CASE NO. 502012CP004391XXXXNBIH
ESTATE OF SIMON L. BERNSTEIN,
____________________________________/

TED BERNSTEIN, as Trustee Probate Division
of the Shirley Bernstein Trust Agreement
Case No.: 502014CP003698XXXXNBIH
dated May 20, 2008, as amended,
Plaintiff,

It Says Trust and Trustee right in the Filings and yet a Family Court, a Probate Court that has NO Jurisdiction over Trust Cases are STILL Controlling this Case, WHY?

"Finally, this Court should take notice of the attached 60(a) and (b) Motion for the Illinois
Federal Court case (Exhibit 2 - 60(a) and (b) Case # 13-cv-03643 - US District Court of
Eastern Illinois,) which outlines the continuing and ongoing fraud on the Illinois Federal Court and Hon. Judge John Robert Blakey and on this Court being committed by this
Court’s Court Appointed Officers (Attorneys, Fiduciaries and Guardian.)

This filing should also provide ample cause for this Court to stay the proceedings and have all
parties involved in the ongoing Fraud on the Court and Fraud on the True & Proper
Beneficiaries and Interested Party to be called to show cause involving the frauds
committed that have deprived the Eliot Bernstein family of their US and Florida
Constitutional rights to fair and impartial due process and procedure rights and MORE."

"Further, stay the proceedings to report and correct all recently discovered frauds upon the court by Court appointed officers, discovered in hearings held before this Court on February 16, 2017 and March 02, 2017, based on claims that Eliot Bernstein was not a beneficiary of his mother and
father’s estates and trusts and where it was learned that in fact at the minimum he is a
beneficiary with standing in his father’s estate.

Eliot believes that if the Court reviews the 60(b) motion and the documents attached, the two Wills and two Inter-vivos Trusts that were declared valid at the December 15, 2015 hearing that the Court will see that not only does Eliot have standing in each as Natural Born son but that each document has him named as a beneficiary despite any claims or orders or pleadings claiming he is not.

Source and Filed Motion to Postpone
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QbdaI_CGlzP63wBUDV74pMffp2Bg3rwd/view?usp=sharing

More on the Above Case
http://tedbernsteinreport.blogspot.com/

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.