Tuesday, January 6, 2015

So Funny Dumb Ass Marc Randazza Defends Rush Limbaugh and says Sandra Fluke has no Case. Yet he has his law firm sue a female blogger for allegedly calling his wife a Slut. And well ya ummm there seems to be a whole lot more EVIDENCE to suggest that Jennifer Randazza is or was a SLUT then Sandra Fluke, just Sayin'

Yet Marc Randazza has his law firm Randazza Legal Group represent his wife, Jennifer Randazza to sue Monica Foster / Alexandra Melody for allegedly calling Jennifer Randazza a Prostitute, which I don't believe that Monica Foster did this. She did discuss the whole Slut issue as per my post regarding Marc's post on his knocking her up in an unprotected sex incident in Cabo, so he better had marry her and make an honest woman of her.

Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group, as I recall, said that Sandra Fluke had no case against Rush Limbaugh for calling Sandra Fluke a SLUT and as you see below insinuating the whole prostitution thing. Mr. Randazza says it's unAmerican to sue Rush Limbaugh, yet it's ok by him to suppress Free Speech, abuse the Courts and sue whoever he wants for throwing the ol' SLUT word around. Again I say Marc Randazza has his law firm Randazza Legal Group are the most hypocritical legal cluster fuck in the world.



Sandra Fluke has NO VALID Defamation Claim Says Fucktard Marc Randazza but you see my wife does cuz um Neener Neener and I run the courts so there.

Come on Now Marcy Baby "Why we have a First Amendment; show your love for It" as you quoted in the above hypocrisy.  Such a Jackass.

Marcy says, "Sandra Fluke is a public figure

When you purposely inject yourself into public debate, you lose your status as a "just minding my own business" private citizen."

YEPPERS and Ms Dumbdazza Sued ME a Public Figure and she purposely interjected her shit into my shit and therefore shit rolls down that proverbial hill and wala Jennifer Randazza is a PUBLIC FIGURE.

"The purpose of the First Amendment is to ensure the unfettered exchange of ideas among the American people. See Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 484 (1957). The First Amendment does not demand politeness, fairness, nor that debate should be measured and soft. In fact, the First Amendment provides ample breathing room for political discourse to get nasty, unfair, and brutish. See Sullivan, 376 U.S. at 270. Furthermore, the First Amendment does not require that every statement be 100% objectively true, nor does it allow defamation suits to continue every time a statement is false, or implies a nasty falsehood."
http://www.dmlp.org/blog/2012/no-sandra-fluke-does-not-have-valid-defamation-claim-against-rush-limbaugh

YEP case after case, YAP after YAP Marc Randazza proves 
to be the WORLDS most Hypocritical Attorney. 



Marc J. Randazza Says;

"Wah! But Rush Limbaugh called her a "prostitute."

No. No, he didn't.


Yes, literally, Rush Limbaugh said that Sandra Fluke was a "prostitute." However, it should not take too high of a degree of sophistication to understand the difference between actually accusing someone of being a harlot of the night, who takes money for sex, and calling someone a prostitute in the exercise of rhetorical hyperbole."

http://www.dmlp.org/blog/2012/no-sandra-fluke-does-not-have-valid-defamation-claim-against-rush-limbaugh


ahhh Wah! there there Marcy Baby, did some big mean girls call your wife a SLUT? a Prostitute? 

oh I am sorry. I suggest you pull up your big boy panties 
and DEAL WITH IT DUMBASS.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.