Regarding: Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., DC Comics Trademarks Targeted at Children to lure them into watching and becoming "entertained" by Porn.
I am Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox, I have reported extensively for over 3 years regarding the iViewit Technology and the infringement of the iViewit technology by those who signed NDA Agreements such as Warner Bros., as you know from previous disclosure letters send to you, asking that you notify auditors and shareholders.
I Pro Se Plaintiff Crystal L. Cox have recently named you in a RICO / Racketeering Complaint as you know, and surely have disclosed to your shareholders.
In being sued by Porn Attorney Marc Randazza over an alleged Trademark, and to shut down my blogs reporting on the iViewit Technology infringement, I have discovered that Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., DC Comics Trademarks are being Targeted at Children to lure them into watching and becoming addicted to Porn at an early age. I assume that Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., DC Comics, and Liberty Media Holdings know Vivid Entertainment, Steven Hirsch is profiting from the use of Superman and other action figures, superheros in their Porn Movies. These are movies containing the "brands", "trademarks" of Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., and DC Comics. And they are PORN directed toward children in the search engines and video search sites.
It is the responsibility of Liberty Media Holdings, Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., and DC Comics to protect their brands, and their shareholders, so it seems safe to assume that either Liberty Media Holdings, Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., and DC Comics is suing Vivid Entertainment, Steven Hirsch regarding Superman Porn and other Action Figure, Comic Porn, Superhero Porn and the use of their Copyright, their Trademark. OR Liberty Media Holdings, Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., and DC Comics has licensed Vivid Entertainment, Steven Hirsch to market porn directly to Children with the Trademark of Superheros, Action Heros, Comic.
Do the shareholders of Liberty Media Holdings, Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., and DC Comics know about this licensing? Do the shareholders of Liberty Media Holdings, Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., and DC Comics also profit from the use of "company" trademarks in Porn Parodies, Superman Movies?
"Warner Bros. Wins ‘Superman’ Copyright Case Against Joe Shuster’s Heirs"
DC Comics, Inc. DC Entertainment is a company of Warner Bros. Entertainment, which itself is owned by Time Warner. DC Comics produces material featuring a large number of well-known characters, including Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman, Green Lantern, the Flash, Aquaman, Hawkman, Hawkgirl, Green Arrow, Black Canary and the Martian Manhunter, along with such superhero teams as the Justice League and the Teen Titans, as well as antagonists such as Lex Luthor, the Joker, Darkseid, the Riddler, Catwoman, Brainiac and the Penguin. Many of these are used in Vivid Entertainment, Steven Hirsch and Axel Braun's Porn Parody which is superheros, action figures, engaging in Porn.
Vivid Entertainment is in the search for Comic Book Movie, Fan Sites, Action Figure News, and this is PORN, this is not to lure in adults. It is targeted at getting children interested in and addicted to porn, through their favorite action figures, Superheros, and these Superheros are Copyrighted by Disney and Warner Bros.
This site also sells Superman, Comic Book merchandise.
Comics and Porn, is this an image that Warner Bros. wants? Do Warner Bros., Time Warner, DC Comics shareholders Support this?
The Search Term DC Comics should by copyrighted by Time Warner, Warner Bros., yet nothing is done to protect the DC Comics Brand from being used in Porn that is directed at Children. Liberty Media Holdings attorney sues people often for the smallest possibly infringement, so surely this HUGE use of a Time Warner Inc. Brand, is licensed and profited from by Liberty Media Holdings, TWX, Warner Bros. and Time Warner or Liberty Media Holdings attorneys Jordan Rushie and Mark Randazza would be suing them right?
Instead Liberty Media Holdings attorney Jordan Rushie is attacking a blogger who is exposing the porn industry, and speaking out about the iViewit Technology and Liberty Media Holdings attorney Marc Randazza is suing that same blogger, me, and alleging a Trademark infringement and he wants 100,000 for each alleged infringement and massive attorney fees.
Below is a Vivid Entertainment, Steven Hirsch Superman Porn Movie Trailer in YouTube and easily found in the search engines by your children.
This Superman Porn "official teaser" comes up in the YouTube search right along side your other Superman, Superhero and Action Figure Videos.
A the end of this Superman Video is a *Disclaimer* "This is a parody movie. Superman is a registered trademark of DC Comics, a general partnership, composed of Warner Communication Inc. and E.C. Publications, Inc. This video is not sponsored, endorsed, by or affiliated with DC Comics, Warner Communications Inc. or E.C. Publications, Inc. or any other person or entity affiliated with any of them."
Warn Bros., Time Warner Inc. is the owner of the Superman trademark, so this seems to be saying that Warn Bros., Time Warner Inc. does not endorse the movie, however, that certainly does not mean that Warn Bros., Time Warner Inc. and Liberty Media Holdings is not profiting from the movie. How can they not be, with the massive aggression that these Porn Industry, Copyright Troll Attorneys such as Jordan Rush Marc Randazza use against the tiniest of infringement on imaginary trademarks. Surely if there was a trademark issue with Superman, then Warn Bros., Time Warner Inc. part owner Liberty Media Holdings would have their thug attorneys sue Vivid Entertainment.
If Warn Bros., Time Warner Inc. Disgraces the Brand, Misuse the Copyright, Tarnish the Trademark, does the rights revert back to the Siegel Family, the Heirs, Laura Siegel Larson
Another Superman Porn Movie Trailer in YouTube
Liberty Media Holdings and Porn Companies, Porn Attorneys, Some Legal Cases. There are many cases where Jordan Rushie, Marc Randazza, J. Malcom DeVoy and Ronald Green sue people for allegedly infringing on Liberty Media Holdings copyrighted material.
More about the Massive Shareholder Liability over the iViewit Technology Infringment by Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc.
Liberty Media Holdings Attorney, also Corbin Fisher and other Porn Companies, Marc J. Randazza SUED me, blogger Crystal Cox, and iViewit Inventor Eliot Bernstein claiming that he had a Trademark on the name Marc Randazza. Manwin sued Nicholas Bulgin regarding ManwinSucks.com, yet these these Porn Companies profiting massively from a real Trademark is somehow overlooked. So I assume that the Trademark owner is profiting or they would sue.
Porn Attorney Marc Randazza also claimed in Randazza V. Cox, Bernstein that he wanted the Courts to STOP me, Blogger Crystal Cox from titling blogs and YouTube Videos with the name Marc Randazza, so I would not come up in the search for his name when talking about him. Yet SUPERMAN, Porn, Comics, DC Comics all come up in Porn Searches and are definitely a well known, household name Trademark.
Liberty Media Holdings owns part of Time Warner Inc., therefore owns part of the Superman Trademark Profit, and DC Comics yet Liberty Media Holdings sues people who download porn from their sites, who allegedly infringe on their copyright? Liberty Media Holdings would SUE Vivid Entertainment Steven Hirsch and Axel Braun if they were not getting ROYALTIES.
So the question then becomes do the shareholders of Time Warner Inc., Warner Bros., Liberty Media Holdings know what they are profiting from Porn directed at children through their favorite super hero or action figure?
Do Liberty Media Holdings Shareholders, Time Warner Inc. Shareholders, Warner Bros. shareholders know about the iViewit Technology Infringement and the massive liability to them?
Do Liberty Media Holdings Shareholders, Time Warner Inc. Shareholders, Warner Bros. shareholders know about being named in a 100 Billion Dollar Racketeering Lawsuit filed in February of 2013?
Also Check Out
iViewit RICO Crime Chart
Full RICO Filing
iViewit Supreme Court Case
iViewit SEC Complaint
iViewit Motion to ReHear